After OLS produces coefficient estimates, statistical inference asks how much uncertainty remains and whether a coefficient is distinguishable from a stated null value (often zero). Inference uses the estimate, its standard error, and a test or interval. It does not replace residual checking, and it does not by itself prove that the predictor is important in practice.
After OLS produces coefficient estimates, statistical inference asks how much uncertainty remains and whether a coefficient is distinguishable from a stated null value (often zero). Inference uses the estimate, its standard error, and a test or interval. It does not replace residual checking, and it does not by itself prove that the predictor is important in practice.
Suppose the fitted slope of demand on temperature is positive and the associated p-value is small. That suggests, under the model assumptions, that a zero slope is a poor description of the sample. It does not by itself say that the temperature effect is large enough for operations planning.
A confidence interval for a coefficient is a range built from β̂ and its SE. In repeated sampling under the model, a 95% interval procedure covers the true coefficient about 95% of the time. One interval from one sample is not a 95% chance that the true value “is inside” in a mystical sense; it is the result of that procedure.
Statistical significance is not the same as practical significance. A tiny slope can be “significant” in a large sample. A large slope can fail a test in a short, noisy series. Always read the size of β̂ (and the units of x and y) together with the test.
Time-series warning: if residuals are autocorrelated, ordinary SEs, t-statistics and p-values can be misleading even when β̂ itself is a reasonable point fit. Adequacy checking comes before trusting inference.